Daily Mail journalist Richard Littlejohn has frequently pointed out that (the dishonourable Jew who betrayed the essential tenets of Judaism) Jeffrey Epstein used what in fact were very willing call-girls - young as they were - to provide various 'services'. Girls who knew perfectly well what might be expected of them given the very generous sums they were being paid when travelling the often vast distances to perform their roles. Let us not forget that at age 14-16 young girls can be just as crafty and manipulative and scheming as any adult age over 18. They are not all as fragile and vulnerable as they and their lawyers later make them out to be.

In the three monotheistic faiths - Judaism, Christianity and Islam - the main standard of behaviour that was expected when it came to sexual relations between a man and a woman was: 'No sex before marriage'. In earlier times people got married at ages under 16 - see the following extract on the Mary the mother of Jesus getting married to Joseph at possibly age 12.

We don't EVER hear, do we, by analogy with Jeffrey Epstein, that Joseph, the father of Jesus, was a p*********?

Richard Littlejohn, as will be seen from his 6 February 2026 Daily Mail column and previous pronouncements, thinks Epstein's 'victims' were not the incontrovertible victims they (and their supporters) make themselves out to be. Rather that they were aspiring call-girls all to willing to earn good money in the oldest profession. A working girl must begin sometime. The seeds of the idea of working as a prostitute do not all of a sudden germinate on the very next day after one's 18th birthday. Virginia Roberts/Giuffre was possibly not the wholly innocent 'victim' she (and now her family) make her out to be. Why not say 'No'? Why not go home? Ah! But the money is so good! The travel. Meeting a Prince! What about the parents? Turning a blind eye?

Food for thought from Richard Littlejohn.






Richard Littlejohn on the motivation behind Epstein's victims